message board

your email

books

music

communities

join the conversation

write for us

add your site

    

 

  GINKWORLD: VOICES: article 

 

 

[site search]   [ report a dead link] [ message board] [add your voice]

Should All Christians Have The Same Political Agenda?

By chuck scott

 

I was reading the Letters to the Editor section of a fairly well known Christian magazine. A few of the readers were concerned over the recent backlash toward President Bush's policy on the war in Iraq in the previous month's Letters to the Editor. One reader was saddened by the many negative comments toward our 'Christian' president. Other comments ranged from, "I was grieved," to, "I was shocked that people who call themselves Christian would bash another Christian." My favorite was a sort of justification for Bush's stance on the war in Iraq because, "we finally have a president who is pro-life."

 

I looked at the letters from the month before, and there were some in there that were 'bashing' President Bush, questioning his faith and salvation. Mostly they were against Bush's policy, not Bush personally.

 

Whether or not Bush is a Christian or not is beside the point. I am not going to question his salvation. In fact, I feel that he should (as well as everyone else) work out his own salvation with fear and trembling.  Philippians 2:12 &13

 

What is of concern is one letter writer's seeming lack of study of scripture. She had asked, "What ever happened to the commands in Romans 13:1 and  1Timothy 2:2?" Why is it when we see the word submit in Romans 13:1 we seem to always think of the word obey? Submission is not obedience. To submit is to yield to governance or authority. To obey would be to follow. One can submit to God without obeying  Him. A perfect example of this was Ananias and Saphira. They did not obey God, but they ultimately submitted to Him. It was against their will that they submitted.

 

In 1Timothy 2:2 we are told to pray and intercede, being thankful for kings and those in authority. Nowhere in there does it tell us to agree with them. Now, I respect our president because he is the president and permitted that honor. Do I agree with all of his policies? No. I personally agree with his policy on abortion. I am thankful that he is pro-life. What I don't agree with is that he claims to be pro-life ( I know that this is in the context of abortion) yet he is for the death penalty and war; both of which are just as much murder as abortion is. Am I still submitting to him? Of course I am. I'm not out there holding the prison hostage until he changes his mind on the death penalty, nor am I plotting against the government by supporting our enemies. I am, however, in public disagreement with his administration's policies concerning war, the death penalty and his lack of concern for the African aids crisis. (yet another issue)

 

Getting back to that writer who implied that we are to submit, (I believe that she was confusing the word submit for obey) to all leaders for they are appointed by God, I would be curious as to what her political stance would have been  if  we were in 1930's Germany. I am sure, without taking the time to research it, that Hitler had some good policies. I am sure any one of us would have thought that  he was doing some good as far as leaders go. What was wrong with him was his intense hatred for the Jewish people that surfaced later. When he started to take away the rights of the Jewish would she have gone along with it because we are supposed to follow our leaders?  If she were to follow the Romans 13 doctrine she would have. When they started to take them to the concentration camps would she have gone along with it because God appoints our leaders? --I would hope not!

 

I have read somewhere that Hitler used Romans13 as a tool during his reign. I want to add that I cannot prove that historically, just something that I read.

 

I am in no way comparing Bush to Hitler..

 

I believe that Bush is a Christian. Still, I have not found one instance in the Gospels to justify war, and feel that he, being a Christian, should have proven that biblically to the citizens of the United States before sending troops anywhere. With that stance I can be labeled a heretic, antichrist, and anti American. So much for free speech.

 

In Luke 6:27-36 we are told to love our enemies, do good to those who hate us, turn the other cheek. Some people will argue that is meant for the individual not the collective. They will say this even when there is no scripture to back it up.

 

So, can Christians disagree on political issues and still be Christians? I think we can. We can't get the whole sprinkle/immersion baptism thing thought out; but we still agree we're Christian. I think we need to have open dialogue on these sort of issues. I end this with scripture that I feel backs up my anti war stance. I encourage you to study this issue. Pray about it. Think about it.

 

We are not called to be lemmings. We are called to be disciples.

 

Scripture:

 

Romans 13: 1&2

Matthew 5: 3-10 (emphasis on v.7-10), 5:38-48, 6:14&15

Luke 6:27-36

  

________________________

Chuck Scott still lives in So. Illinois with his huge family in a small house. Contrary to the mood of this article, Chuck is not really a crank. Chuck encourages everyone to be involved in life, and dares people to email him.

 

 

  

  

shameless ads 

[click here to place an ad with ginkworld]